← All monthly reports

Monthly report

August 2026

Abstract blue and green light passing through overlapping translucent curves, with a luminous crossing and subtle frosted texture.
August’s calendar made activity look quieter: total instructions fell 4.8% versus July, but rose 1.6% on a standardised week. Entry activity rose 8.1%, with FX and Gold gaining share.
On this page

01 · Instruction overview

The month in instruction activity

August’s calendar made activity look quieter: total instructions fell 4.8% versus July, but rose 1.6% on a standardised week. Entry activity rose 8.1%, with FX and Gold gaining share.

All tracked instructions−4.8%vs July 2026
Entry instructions+8.1%management and other instructions fell 22.0%
Entry share of activity64.8%was 57% in July 2026
FX + metals share67.3%share of entry instructions across the two classes

Entry versus management and other instructions

Each row shows the composition of all tracked instructions in that window.

July 2026
August 2026

Entry instructionsManagement and other

Entry instructions8.1% increase
Management and other instructions22.0% decrease
All tracked instructions−4.8%
Entry share of the total7.8 pp increase

02 · Rotation

Where entry activity went

A change in market share and a change in activity answer different questions. Read the class rotation beside the combined share of the leading markets to distinguish a reshuffle from greater concentration.

The asset-class mix

Share of entry-instruction activity in August 2026.

Foreign exchange: 35.2% of tracked flowMetals: 32.1% of tracked flowEquity indices: 19% of tracked flowCrypto: 12.3% of tracked flowOther: 1.4% of tracked flow100%of activity · August 2026
  • Foreign exchange35.2%
  • Metals32.1%
  • Equity indices19%
  • Crypto12.3%
  • Other1.4%

July 2026 → August 2026

  • FX + metals59.7% → 67.3%7.6 pp increase
  • Indices + crypto37.8% → 31.3%6.5 pp decrease
Asset-class figures and notes
Asset-class activity, August 2026 against July 2026
Asset classActivity shareShare changeActivity change
Foreign exchange35.2%+5.6 pp+28.4%
Metals32.1%+2.0 pp+15.3%
Equity indices19%−5.1 pp−14.7%
Crypto12.3%−1.3 pp−2.8%
Other1.4%−1.1 pp−37.7%

Foreign exchange

Its share rose by 5.6 percentage points; entry activity rose by 28.4%.

The three leading pairs supplied 53.4% of FX activity.

Metals

Its share rose by 2.0 percentage points; entry activity rose by 15.3%.

Gold is 98.9% of metals activity — the metals category is functionally a gold category.

Equity indices

Its share fell by 5.1 percentage points; entry activity fell by 14.7%.

Nasdaq 100 supplied 41% of index activity.

Crypto

Its share fell by 1.3 percentage points; entry activity fell by 2.8%.

Bitcoin is 98.3% of crypto activity — the crypto category is functionally a bitcoin category.

Other

Its share fell by 1.1 percentage points; entry activity fell by 37.7%.

Energy, single stocks and ETFs, synthetic indices and the remaining long tail.

Contribution and concentration

Contribution to the net activity change

Contribution to the net change in entry activity. Positive and negative contributions can offset; a contribution can exceed 100% when another class offsets part of the change.

  • Foreign exchange+103.4%
  • Metals+56.5%
  • Equity indices−43.7%
  • Crypto−4.7%
  • Other−11.5%
Four leading markets combined59.3% → 59.7%The four leading markets in each period; membership can differ between months.
  • Gold share of metals98.9%
  • Bitcoin share of crypto98.3%
  • Nasdaq 100 share of indices41%
  • Three leading pairs share of FX53.4%

04 · Gold

The single leading market by instruction share

Gold is the single leading market by share of entry instructions in this edition. Gold's activity share and historical instruction direction do not establish adoption, execution quality or performance.

31.8%of entry activity
98.9%of metals activity
90.3%as much activity as the entire FX class
15.5% increaseentry-activity change

Gold’s weekly share of entry activity

Share of entry activity within each labelled weekday window. A single date marks a day at the month boundary; bar height measures share, not volume.

3–7 Aug: 30.3%3–7 Aug10–14 Aug: 29.7%10–14 Aug17–21 Aug: 34%17–21 Aug24–28 Aug: 38%24–28 Aug31 Aug: 33.1%31 Aug
  • 3–7 Aug30.3%
  • 10–14 Aug29.7%
  • 17–21 Aug34%
  • 24–28 Aug38%
  • 31 Aug33.1%

Explore the market

Gold, beyond the monthly snapshot

Live chart

Explore XAUUSD with TradingView’s interactive chart. This is the OANDA feed in US dollars. Chart times are in UTC. This live chart updates beyond August 2026; the report’s historical findings remain fixed. Prices can differ from your broker’s feed.

Open gold on TradingView

The embedded chart connects to TradingView only when you load it.

08 · Market context

The releases and reference prices behind the month

External market context, published to be useful rather than explanatory. Co-movement does not establish causality, and none of these are event studies.

During the month

  1. 7 August

    July employment release (NFP)

    At 08:30 New York time on 7 August, BLS initially reported a 23,000 decline in July nonfarm payrolls and a 4.1% unemployment rate. This was July’s employment report, released during August.

    Source: US Bureau of Labor Statistics · original 7 August release

    Reading note

    The edition compares full source-calendar months. Its monthly instruction figures are not an event-window measurement around this release.

    Use the information available on the release date when interpreting historical activity. No announcement-response or causal effect is established here.

  2. 12 August

    July inflation release (CPI)

    July CPI, released on 12 August at 08:30 New York time, rose 0.1% month on month on a seasonally adjusted basis and 3.4% year on year on an unadjusted basis. Core CPI rose 0.2% month on month.

    Source: US Bureau of Labor Statistics · 12 August CPI release

    Reading note

    Monthly activity shares can be read alongside the inflation backdrop, but they do not isolate the instructions sent in response to this release.

    The reference month is July. August CPI was not available during August; the two dates must not be conflated.

  3. 19 August

    July FOMC minutes

    The Federal Reserve released the minutes of its 28–29 July meeting on 19 August at 14:00 New York time.

    Source: Federal Reserve · FOMC minutes release

    Reading note

    This date belongs in the month’s information timeline. Pulse’s weekly Gold shares describe the surrounding instruction mix without measuring the announcement’s immediate effect.

    Minutes describe the earlier meeting and are not a new August rate decision. Co-occurrence is not a causal test.

  4. 26 August

    July PCE inflation

    The July PCE price index, released on 26 August, rose 0.2% month on month and 3.7% year on year. Excluding food and energy, it rose 0.2% month on month and 3.3% year on year.

    Source: US Bureau of Economic Analysis · July income and outlays

    Reading note

    The late-month price-policy backdrop is external context for the complete edition, rather than an explanation assigned to each instruction.

    PCE and CPI are different price measures. These release figures do not establish why any particular instruction was sent.

  5. 28 August

    Jackson Hole speech

    In his 28 August Jackson Hole speech, Federal Reserve Chair Kevin Warsh stressed that inflation remained above target and did not commit to a rate decision.

    Source: Federal Reserve · 28 August speech

    Reading note

    The Gold share chart includes the complete weekday window containing this speech. It measures Gold’s share of entry instructions, not a response attributable to the speech.

    Jackson Hole is a policy communication event, not itself a rate decision. No intraday response study is claimed.

Market references

  1. FX · month-end reference prices

    From 31 July to 31 August, the Federal Reserve’s New York noon reference rate moved from 1.1519 to 1.1617 USD per euro (+0.85%) and from 159.16 to 159.74 yen per USD (+0.36%). These are reference observations, not broker closes.

    Source: Federal Reserve H.10 · 8 September release (August month-end)

    Reading note

    EUR/USD entry activity changed +43.9% and USD/JPY +26.8% in the complete-month comparison.

    Price change and instruction activity use separate denominators. A positive USD/JPY price change means a stronger dollar against the yen; no participation inference or causal conclusion follows.

  2. FX · comparison-price source

    The Federal Reserve’s 3 August H.10 release supplies the 31 July comparison observations for the month-end price changes above.

    Source: Federal Reserve H.10 · 3 August release (July month-end)

    Reading note

    The price comparison uses month-end reference observations; Pulse activity compares complete source-calendar months.

    External prices and internal instruction shares remain separate statistics. Reference rates can differ from specific broker quotes.

Explore the market

Explore the currency backdrop

Live chart

Explore EUR/USD and USD/JPY with the watchlist or symbol selector. These OANDA feeds quote US dollars per euro and yen per US dollar, respectively. Chart times are in UTC. This live chart updates beyond August 2026; the report’s historical findings remain fixed. Prices can differ from your broker’s feed.

The monthly observations above are Federal Reserve reference rates. This separate OANDA chart is for exploring price history; it does not reproduce that benchmark series or explain instruction activity.

Open EUR/USD on TradingView

The embedded chart connects to TradingView only when you load it.

Later revisions

  1. After month-end · the payroll revision

    On 4 September, BLS revised July payroll growth from the initial −23,000 to +21,000 and first reported August payroll growth of +162,000.

    Source: US Bureau of Labor Statistics · 4 September employment release

    Reading note

    This later information is included to make the historical record clear. It was not available to explain August instruction activity.

    A revised estimate is useful for today’s record but must not replace what was known on 7 August in an event interpretation.

Reference

Go deeper into the data

Open the breakdown that interests you. Every table, definition and source remains available here.

Markets, rankedShares and changes for each leading market

03 · Markets

Where entry-instruction activity went

Market share answers a narrow question: what portion of tracked entry instructions went to each normalised market. It does not establish adoption, popularity, exposure or performance.

Share of entry activity

Leading normalised markets with complete activity comparisons, selected after internal quality safeguards.

0%10%20%30%Gold: 31.8%Gold31.8%▲ 15.5Bitcoin (BTC/USD): 12.1%Bitcoin (BTC/USD)12.1%▼ 2.5EUR/USD: 8%EUR/USD8%▲ 43.9Nasdaq 100: 7.8%Nasdaq 1007.8%▼ 16.6GBP/USD: 6.2%GBP/USD6.2%▲ 20.3USD/JPY: 4.5%USD/JPY4.5%▲ 26.8
Leading market activity, August 2026 against July 2026
MarketActivity shareComparison shareActivity change
Gold31.8%29.7%+15.5%
Bitcoin (BTC/USD)12.1%13.4%−2.5%
EUR/USD8%6%+43.9%
Nasdaq 1007.8%10.1%−16.6%
GBP/USD6.2%5.6%+20.3%
USD/JPY4.5%3.9%+26.8%
Direction of entry instructionsLong and short shares, by market and asset class

06 · Direction Balance

Direction Balance, weighted by instructions

The activity-weighted long share moved from 50.3% to 55.9%. The activity changes below show whether each side rose or fell.

July 202650.3% long
August 202655.9% long
Long-directed 20.3% increaseShort-directed 4.1% decrease

By asset class

Net long/short bias in percentage points.

← skews shortskews long →-30.0-15.00+15.0+30.0Foreign exchange: +14.6 points long biasForeign exchange+14.6Metals: +5.2 points long biasMetals+5.2Equity indices: +9.4 points long biasEquity indices+9.4Crypto: +23.6 points long biasCrypto+23.6net bias, percentage points (long % − short %)

By leading market

Net long/short bias in percentage points.

← skews shortskews long →-50.0-25.00+25.0+50.0Gold: +5.4 points long biasGold+5.4Bitcoin (BTC/USD): +24.2 points long biasBitcoin (BTC/USD)+24.2EUR/USD: +31.2 points long biasEUR/USD+31.2GBP/USD: -2.0 points short biasGBP/USD-2.0USD/JPY: +46.4 points long biasUSD/JPY+46.4Nasdaq 100: +7.0 points long biasNasdaq 100+7.0net bias, percentage points (long % − short %)
Historical entry direction, August 2026 against July 2026
SeriesJuly 2026 longAugust 2026 longChange
Foreign exchange49.8%57.3%+7.5 pp
Metals48.2%52.6%+4.4 pp
Equity indices49%54.7%+5.7 pp
Crypto58.1%61.8%+3.7 pp
Gold48.2%52.7%+4.5 pp
Bitcoin (BTC/USD)58.2%62.1%+3.9 pp
EUR/USD55.5%65.6%+10.1 pp
GBP/USD51.1%49%−2.1 pp
USD/JPY54.6%73.2%+18.6 pp
Nasdaq 10049.8%53.5%+3.7 pp

Persistence across weekdays

Number of weekdays above 50% long and the median daily long share.

Weekday direction persistence, August 2026
MarketWeekdays above 50% longMedian daily long share
Gold15 of 2152.2%
Bitcoin (BTC/USD)20 of 2163.2%
EUR/USD20 of 2167.1%
GBP/USD9 of 2148.4%
USD/JPY18 of 2174.9%
Nasdaq 10011 of 2151.4%

The share compares long-directed and short-directed entry instructions. Read their activity changes separately: a higher share can accompany rising or falling activity.

When instructions arrivedHourly patterns, weekdays and weekends

05 · The clock

How instruction activity varied across the day

Automation does not mean around the clock. One hour of the day carries 5.63% of instructions and another carries 1.76% — a 3.2× swing between the busiest and quietest hour. The comparison window's ratio was 3.32×. But that network-wide shape is a weighted average of four very different rhythms, and it should be read alongside the separate class patterns.

Hour labels provisionalCoverage follows complete source-calendar months. The source timezone has not been independently confirmed, so hour labels remain source-clock labels and must not be aligned precisely with market announcements.

Flow by hour of day

Share of the month’s entry instructions in each source-clock hour. These labels are not aligned to market-event times while the storage timezone remains unconfirmed.

Source-clock hours · timezone confirmation pending

00:00 — 4.48% of monthly entry activity0001:00 — 4.84% of monthly entry activity02:00 — 4.25% of monthly entry activity03:00 — 3.77% of monthly entry activity0304:00 — 3.64% of monthly entry activity05:00 — 4.19% of monthly entry activity06:00 — 4.23% of monthly entry activity0607:00 — 4.23% of monthly entry activity08:00 — 4.15% of monthly entry activity09:00 — 4.02% of monthly entry activity0910:00 — 3.97% of monthly entry activity11:00 — 4.22% of monthly entry activity12:00 — 4.89% of monthly entry activity1213:00 — 5.63% of monthly entry activity5.63%14:00 — 5.44% of monthly entry activity15:00 — 4.84% of monthly entry activity1516:00 — 4.26% of monthly entry activity17:00 — 4.07% of monthly entry activity18:00 — 4.01% of monthly entry activity1819:00 — 4.01% of monthly entry activity20:00 — 3.39% of monthly entry activity21:00 — 1.76% of monthly entry activity1.76%2122:00 — 3.73% of monthly entry activity23:00 — 3.97% of monthly entry activity
Data table — source hours
Data — entry instructions by hour, August 2026
HourShareChange
00:00–01:004.48%+0.1 pp
01:00–02:004.84%+0.4 pp
02:00–03:004.25%+0.1 pp
03:00–04:003.77%-0.2 pp
04:00–05:003.64%-0.3 pp
05:00–06:004.19%0 pp
06:00–07:004.23%0 pp
07:00–08:004.23%-0.1 pp
08:00–09:004.15%-0.3 pp
09:00–10:004.02%-0.2 pp
10:00–11:003.97%-0.2 pp
11:00–12:004.22%-0.2 pp
12:00–13:004.89%+0.1 pp
13:00–14:005.63%+0.4 pp
14:00–15:005.44%+0.3 pp
15:00–16:004.84%+0.2 pp
16:00–17:004.26%0 pp
17:00–18:004.07%0 pp
18:00–19:004.01%-0.2 pp
19:00–20:004.01%0 pp
20:00–21:003.39%-0.1 pp
21:00–22:001.76%+0.2 pp
22:00–23:003.73%+0.1 pp
23:00–00:003.97%+0.2 pp

Different markets, different hourly patterns

The combined hourly pattern weights each class by its instruction activity. The class-level figures below show how those rhythms differ; source-clock labels remain provisional.

  • Foreign exchange
    17.7%in 12:00–15:591.33×busiest vs quietest hour5%weekend vs weekday rate
  • Metals
    24.9%in 12:00–15:5961.98×busiest vs quietest hour4.6%weekend vs weekday rate
  • Equity indices
    21.4%in 12:00–15:5920.58×busiest vs quietest hour4.3%weekend vs weekday rate
  • Crypto
    17.3%in 12:00–15:591.14×busiest vs quietest hour104.5%weekend vs weekday rate
Data table — rhythm by asset class
Intraday concentration by asset class, August 2026
Asset classShare in 12:00–15:59Peak-to-quiet ratioWeekend vs weekday rate
Foreign exchange17.7%1.33×5%
Metals24.9%61.98×4.6%
Equity indices21.4%20.58×4.3%
Crypto17.3%1.14×104.5%

Metals swing 61.98× between their busiest and quietest hour; crypto swings 1.14×. Read the separate market patterns before applying the combined hourly pattern to one market. These figures do not measure execution or liquidity.

Weekends are a different market mix entirely

Weekend activity is roughly 13% of an average weekday, but its composition is a different market entirely. A weekend instruction can be received when the underlying market is not trading normally — this says nothing about execution or liquidity.

Weekday composition

Weekend composition

Crypto is 8.7% of weekday activity and 67.7% of weekend activity. These are different instruction mixes. Weekend instructions for FX, metals and indices can still be received when those markets are not trading normally; this describes instructions reaching the bridge, not executions, liquidity or fills.

Data table — weekday vs weekend composition
Activity composition, weekday vs weekend, August 2026
Asset classShare of weekday activityShare of weekend activity
Foreign exchange36.5%13.7%
Metals33.4%11.5%
Equity indices19.9%6.4%
Crypto8.7%67.7%
Other1.5%0.7%

Flow by day of week

Indexed so the average weekday = 100, which corrects for months containing unequal numbers of each weekday.

Mon: 101.7MonTue: 101.3TueWed: 101.6WedThu: 101.4ThuFri: 94.1FriSat: 9.6SatSun: 17.3Sun
Data table
Data — weekday index, August 2026
DayIndexChange
Mon101.7-1.5
Tue101.3-2.5
Wed101.6-1.3
Thu101.4-0.5
Fri94.1+5.8
Sat9.6-0.8
Sun17.3-2.1

Fast facts

August 2026 · source hours

  • Busiest hour13:00–14:00 · 5.63%
  • Quietest hour21:00–22:00 · 1.76%
  • Peak-to-quiet swing3.2× · July 2026: 3.32×
  • Strongest 4-hour block12:00–15:59 · 20.8%
  • Weekend vs weekday13.4% · of average weekday activity

The weekday index compares average daily entry activity, so a day appearing more often in the month does not automatically get a higher value. This describes historical instruction timing, not a timing recommendation.

How instructions were writtenEntry commands and recognised exit fields

07 · Setup patterns

How the automation was actually written

Entry instructions carry more than a market and a direction. Their command family and recognised exit fields describe how they were constructed. Compare the month-wide mix with the class breakdown before drawing a conclusion from the overall average.

Exit levels attached to entry instructions

Every entry instruction falls into exactly one of these four groups.

Both SL and TP: 52.5%SL only: 14.9%TP only: 3.5%Neither field: 29.1%
  • Both SL and TP52.5%4.2 pp decrease
  • SL only14.9%6.3 pp increase
  • TP only3.5%1.6 pp increase
  • Neither field29.1%3.7 pp decrease
Any stop-loss field67.3%2.0 pp increase
Any take-profit field56%2.6 pp decrease

What this does not say. Measures whether the parsed entry instruction carried a recognised stop-loss or take-profit field. It does not establish that a position was protected: the field may be invalid, protection may come from EA settings, a later instruction, or strategy logic. It is a measurement of instruction text, not of whether anyone managed their risk.

Data table — exit fields, August 2026
Data — exit fields on entry instructions, August 2026 vs July 2026
GroupAugust 2026July 2026Change
Both SL and TP52.5%56.7%-4.2 pp
SL only14.9%8.6%+6.3 pp
TP only3.5%1.9%+1.6 pp
Neither field29.1%32.8%-3.7 pp

How field presence changed within each class

Recognised field presence by asset class, in percentage points versus the stated comparison window. The class breakdown shows which movements contribute to the overall change.

Change in recognised exit-field presence by asset class, percentage points
Asset classSL fieldTP fieldNeither field
Foreign exchange−3.5 pp−14.9 pp+3.5 pp
Metals+2.6 pp+9.1 pp−6.0 pp
Equity indices+3.7 pp−3.1 pp−5.0 pp
Crypto+14.2 pp+9.7 pp−16.8 pp

    Field presence is not risk management. It does not establish valid syntax, broker acceptance, successful execution, or that a position was protected.

    A useful review question rather than a verdict: where is your exit logic intended to live — in the alert itself, in EA settings, in a later management command, or in the strategy — and is that split deliberate?

    How entry commands were constructed

    Compare each family’s share with its activity change. A smaller share can still accompany an increase in instructions.

    • Direct-entry commands96.3% → 96.8%8.7% increase
    • Close-and-reverse entries1.9% → 1.8%1.3% increase
    • Pending-entry commands1.8% → 1.4%16.1% decrease

    Command families received by the bridge. These are not broker order types, confirmed fills, or executed trades.

    Management did not disappear — it changed shape

    These changes describe received management commands. They do not establish how the resulting orders were managed.

    • Pending-order cancellations+18.3%
    • SL/TP modifications+3.9%
    • Side-specific closes+4.6%
    • Close-all / close-both-side−19.7%
    • Percentage-based partial closes−28.7%
    • Volume-based partial closes−60.1%

    Command changes describe the mix of instructions received. They do not establish whether or how a broker order was changed.

    About the data

    How to read the numbers

    The unit

    A tracked instruction is one instruction received by the bridge. It is not a broker fill, an executed order, an open position, or a trading decision.

    Direction

    Direction describes historical entry instructions, never positions, exposure, sentiment or advice.

    Commercial privacy

    Pulse publishes instruction-flow aggregates only. Commercial sizing and participant-denominator metrics stay private.

    Publication safeguard

    Only approved aggregate cells appear; publication-safeguard details remain private.

    Never published

    No commercial sizing or participant-denominator metrics. No absolute instruction or revenue totals. No broker or prop-firm attribution. No performance or profitability claims.

    Publication history

    Revision history

    Both comparison months have been recomputed in full. The changes below preserve a clear record of the earlier figures.

    Partial-month coverage → complete-month coverage
    Complete source-calendar months replace the earlier matched partial windows. Both periods now exclude parser-rejected records, malformed command-symbol echoes and obvious placeholder symbols; these eligibility refinements also change the comparison population.

    2026-08-27 → 2026-08-31
    August coverage now includes the complete month.

    2026-07-27 → 2026-07-31
    The July comparison is recomputed for the complete month under this edition’s eligibility rules. These figures may differ from the separately published July report.

    -0.02 → -4.8
    Total instruction-activity change (%): recomputed on full August and July source-calendar months with consistent eligibility.

    19.1 → 8.1
    Entry instruction-activity change (%): recomputed on full August and July source-calendar months with consistent eligibility.

    -23 → -22
    Management and other instruction-activity change (%): recomputed on full August and July source-calendar months with consistent eligibility.

    65.1 → 64.8
    Entry share of all tracked instructions (%): recomputed on full August and July source-calendar months with consistent eligibility.

    31.5 → 31.8
    Gold share of entry instructions (%): complete-month replacement.

    This data comes from strategies running on PineConnector, the TradingView-to-MetaTrader bridge — run yours.